Hey, Brian!!!
Thanks for replying here! I appreciate that, and tend to listen when You talk about mechanicals on these trials machines.
The flywheel is on, and I think I'm gonna like it. In my "Deathly-Slow Tight Turn" deal I do in a patch of slick clay on my property, it seemed to work well. I didn't kill the bike in my short half hour ride I did yesterday. One thing I did notice was when revving the bike up to clean it out, it took about 2 weeks to wind down.....
Brian, I considered the gasket stacking deal you mentioned as a way to lower compression, and the head spacer as well. I then found out that I have an S3 head on this bike, and there are low-compression combution chamber "inserts" available for my bike, and ordered one of those last week. To my feeble mind, it just seems like changing an insert in the head would be THE most sanitary and/or reliable way to go about lowering compression. A little more expensive, obviously, but no worries of gaskets leaking, or etc.. As long as I don't screw up an O-ring or something else in the process of installing it........
One thing I've wondered about here, and might be cool to discuss..... In the 70s, when people wanted more power from a 2-stroke, one thing folks would do would be to "port" the cylinder. Normally, this involved enlarging, reshaping, smoothing, and God-knows-what-all of the transfer ports and the exhaust port. Typically, if the exhaust port got raised, it was anywhere from a few thousandths of an inch, to maybe a millimeter, to have more exhaust "port-open" time/duration. One thing this almost always did is make the bike a little "pipier", or move most of the bike's power up higher in the rev range. I wonder if stacking gaskets would have a similar effect? It would indeed raise the exhaust port slightly, which changes port timing. I'd bet it would hardly be enough to be noticeable, but has anyone here done this, and if so, what did you notice?
Jimmie